Given that some of the performance improving drugs in use today usually are targeted at weight loss, and in the head of remarkable changes in a physiology of several recently thriving riders, is it time to introduce minimum rider weights?
Under this type of system, a rider with a weight of less than the lower limit could be given a handicap (comparable to ski jumping), which could are available the form of extra weights to keep at it his bike. The reduce could be set in terms of the minimum BMI, absolute body weight, or maybe both (as determined by physiologists), and introduced at the start of a new time giving riders time to get ready.
In my opinion, it would be to the advantage of all riders, as it would certainly prevent a race to your bottom that is harmful to all relevant parties, whether through the use of drugs, or even through extreme diets accompanied by anorexia athletica.
Cycling already has different regulations intended to protect individuals, like the minimum weight to get bikes that prevents teams coming from taking risks with hazardous equipment, or the rule that riders must wear riding a bicycle helmets. It would not require any longer invasion of privacy, neither expensive new tests which will change the outcome of a battle weeks or months after the fact.
Works well in motor racing as a procedure for keeping parity among the area.
But in cycling power plus weight have a major affect on each other, ie bigger drivers tend to produce more electricity than smaller ones.
Not really applicable to cycling Vibram Shoes since weight is somewhat proportional to be able to production of power.
Ps, I'm not really championing the cause for light climbers at all like me at 78kg myself but I assume a riders physical makeup will determine where his part of advantage is either hills,tt Beats Dre Headphones or sprint.
Netserk had written:Would that mean that Quintana ought to be banned? He only weight loads 56.5kg. Or what about Rujano? IIRC he has to 50kg.
of course there wouldn't be the minimum weight but for example the very least bmi Timberland Shoes Australia Melbourne of 18.Several. btw nairo would be 19.Some, which is healthy and I think that had been the point of OP
In my opinion, it may be to the benefit of all competitors, as it would prevent any race to the bottom that's harmful to everyone involved, whether using drugs, or through serious diets accompanied by anorexia athletica.
I wanted to give a serious answer but the premis is only absurd for this sport. to ensure that weight to be controlled your riders all need to make exactly the same power like in car rushing. What do we do to the filed for super lightweights? Add drag to the big guys?
Every rider has a personal the bare minimum weight where thie power lowers off or their health systems start to be affected.
Little riders alread have fines on the flats and relatively carry a strength to weight fees from the bike minimum weight load A 7 kilo bike is often a larger portion of the total excess weight Mbt Shoes Australia Suppliers of a 50 Kilo rider than just a 70 Kilo rider.
Minimum weight loads are a bigger advantage to big riders and can still be over used by an anorexic big male
This years Tour will attribute riders with a maximum bodyweight of 55 kilos as well as year it will be the minimum amount weight
The proper limit would be a limit on emaciation not excess fat. The problem is there is no easy way to evaluate emaciation. Body fat % cannot be utilized because the riders are doing more than simply losing fat; they have consumed loads of their muscle tissue. Check out the biceps of Hesjedal for example.
It is some of those things that is hard to specify but you know it when you see them.
It occurs to me that body building has problems that are sort of related. Once the top body builders did start to look like freaks, the "sport" dropped it coverage in the popular press. Is cycling served effectively by having its riders appear to be they just escaped from Tiffany And Co Silver Bracelet a awareness camp?
"Listen, my son. Have confidence in no one! You can count on no one but yourself. Improve your abilities, son. Harden your body. Become a number one man. Do not ever permit anyone beat you!" Gekitotsu! Satsujin ken
BroDeal wrote:The proper limit is a limit on emaciation not fat. The problem is there is no easy way to determine emaciation. Body fat % cannot be utilised because the riders are doing more than simply losing fat; they have consumed a lot of their muscle tissue. Check out the hands of Hesjedal for example.
It is some of those things that is hard to outline but you know it when you see this.
It occurs to me that body building has problems that are sort of very similar. Once the top body builders began to look like freaks, the "sport" lost it coverage in the popular media channels. Is cycling served very well by having its riders look like they just escaped from a concentration camp?
The idea behind the OP's question is somewhat valid, in any other case extremely unlikely to ever transpire, even if the wording is a bit journey mark by using "minimum weight".
You're suitable about the freak show at Buy Mbt Online the same time. It only further points out in which to be exceptional at strength sport is not healthy.
Emaciated is fast for a little while in accordance with recent trends. Enhanced is very much fast for, well, no less than 7 years apparently.
This is not a ridiculous idea, and those who claim in any other case probably haven't seen many of these riders up close. Also, lots of the objections are easily shot straight down. This won't "penalize light riders". Body fat scales allometrically to overall size, as well as the minimum fat requirements as being a % aren't going to reprimand or reward certain individuals. Additionally, I've never seen any person naturally walking around under 5% excess weight. Obviously, using BMI Pandora Charms Perth or possibly a height/weight chart isn't going to work, but that is an implementation issue, an excellent concept issue. The idea is that if you're going to participate in a Timberland Stockists Melbourne sport this grueling, you need to have a certain degree of health. Body fat % is part of that, and there's no reason it needs to be excluded from health check ups.
The problems comes in the rendering of it, and of course dealing with the potential for abuse. But personally I think it's advisable and one worth pursuing.
http://www.itocp.com/bbs/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
http://palevo.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=1026/index.php?/index.php/index.php
http://bbs.zams.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2784437
http://itopen.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4114598
http://yy43475.imotor.com/viewthread.php?tid=161339&extra= |
