ng contrary to substance, argument confirms this. No contrary,Nike Air Max 90 VT, then, is the first principle of all things in the full sense; the first principle is something different.
But these thinkers make one of the contraries matter, some making the unequal which they take to be the essence of plurality-matter for the One,Nike Free Run Dam, and others making plurality matter for the One. (The former generate numbers out of the dyad of the unequal, i.e. of the great and small, and the other thinker we have referred to generates them out of plurality, while according to both it is generated by the essence of the One.) For even the philosopher who says the unequal and the One are the elements, and the unequal is a dyad composed of the great and small, treats the unequal,Oakland Raiders Barn, or the great and the small, as being one, and does not draw the distinction that they are one in definition,Minnesota Timberwolves Drakter, but not in number. But they do not describe rightly even the principles which they call elements,Belstaff 2013 Ny Jackor, for some name the great and the small with the One and treat these three as elements of numbers, two being matter, one the form; while others name the many and few, because the great and the small are more appropriate in their nature to magnitude than to number; and others name rather the universal character common to these-’that which exceeds and that which is exceeded’. None of these varieties of opinion makes any difference to speak of,Nike Air Max 90 Premium, in view of some of the consequences; they affect only the abstract objections, which these thinkers take care to avoid because the demonstrations they themselves offer are abstract,-with this exception,Tennessee Titans Kvinnor, that if the exceeding and the exceeded are the principles, and not the great and the small, consistency requires that number should come from the elements before does; for number is more universal than as the exceeding and the exceeded are more universal than the great and the small. But as it is, they say one of these things but do not say the other. Others oppose the different and the other to the One, and others oppose plurality to the One. But if,http://coreycauble.com/forums/profile.php?id=31291, as they claim, things consist of contraries,Cleverland Browns, and to the One either there is nothing contrary, or if there is to be anything it is plurality, and the unequal is contrary to the equal, and the different to the same, and the other to the thing itself,http://chaotix-gaming.eu/index.php?site=news_comments&newsID=299, those who oppose the One to plurality have most claim to plausibility, but even their view is inadequate, for the One would on their view be a few; for plurality is opposed to fewness, and the many to the few.
‘The one’ evidently means a measure. And in every case there is some underlying thing with a distinct nature of its own, e.g. in the scale a quarter-tone, in spatial magnitude a finger or a foot or something of the sort,http://auria.cstock.com.tw/viewthread.php?tid=121644&pid=121899&page=1&extra=page%3D1#pid121899, in rhythms a beat or a syllable; and similarly in gravity it is a definite weight; and in the same way in all cases, in qualities a quality, in quantities a quantity (and the measure is indivisible,Tampa Bay Buccaneers Tröjor, in the former case in kind, and in the latter to the sense); which implies that the one is not in itself the substance |
