標題: should I say 63 [打印本頁] 作者: pkqibhvb 時間: 2016-3-5 22:16 標題: should I say 63
When candidates won't facial area facts
Example A is actually Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who not long ago suggested that man made global warming was a vehicle for experts to aggrandize themselves rather than a detailed way of describing the world.
Cartoon shows: Jimmy Margulies' cartoons Cartoon roundup
Extra: Newsday columnists More opinionSubscribe to our e mail list
Twitter Listen closely, however, and you will then hear echoes of the "postmodern" episode on science that was preferred in certain precincts of the academic left two decades ago. In grad school, I was told research was simply one way of looking at the world. But its practitioners cloaked the item in the Supra Tk Society White universalistic dogma of "objectivity" note this inevitable air quotes and effectively imposed their dogma on the everybody else.
That's pretty much what Perry sustains today. "I think there are a important number of scientists who have altered data so that they will have dollars rolling into their projects,Inches he said earlier this month, during a chat of climate change. He also believed that other scientists have been "questioning the original idea that man made our planets atmosphere is what is causing the climate to vary."
The Christian Louboutin Pigalle day after that, in response to a question from a young boy, Perry toss doubt on the idea of individual evolution. "It's a theory that is definitely out there," he said, having both hands on the boy's shoulder muscles. "It's got some gaps in it.Inch
In other words, "science" doesn't have any independent applicability or accuracy; it's just an element that some people believe, and other people do not.
Perry doesn't come right out plus say that either evolution or even climate change is false. Instead, he / she expresses misgivings about the practices and the people propounding them. How come they get to tell us what's real and imaginary, precisely what is true and false?
That will, too, was a hip kept wing line of inquiry when I was in graduate college. And it continued until the hoaxes perpetuated by Alan Sokal, which proclaimed its 15th anniversary that spring.
A professor connected with physics at New York School, Sokal submitted a lengthy article to your journal "Social Text." Filled with impenetrable jargon and dense footnotes, the essay stated that scientists had no unique purchase on reality. Without a doubt, "reality" (airquotes again!) didn't exist. "Physical 'reality,Wi no less than social 'reality,' is a bottom a social in addition to linguistic construct," Sokal wrote, tongue firmly in cheek. "Scientific 'knowledge,' far from being intent, reflects and encodes the dominating ideologies and power operations of the culture that produced it."
The newspaper editors published Sokal's rant within 1996, mistaking it for really serious scholarship. When it ran, he Christian Louboutin Shoes Outlet / she outed himself in another log, explaining how and why he perpetuated the hoax. His prime target was to expose the cerebral laziness that lurked beneath a lot "postmodern" mumbo jumbo on the left. As a devout left winger himself, Longchamp Tote Vancouver even so, he also worried that postmodern assaults on science would injury the causes he held precious.
"There is a real world; its properties are not merely social buildings; facts and evidence matter," Sokal explained. "Theorizing about 'the cultural construction of reality' won't help us all find an effective treatment for Products or devise strategies for protecting against global warming."
And make absolutely no mistake about it: The globe is actually warming. Perry's jibe about "manipulated data" seemed to talk about emails stolen from weather researchers at the University associated with East Anglia, one of which referred Jordan Retro 4 Canada to your "trick" in the data. But five subsequent investigations confirmed of which none of the scientists had misrepresented or skewed Ghd Hair Dryer their discoveries.
Nor is there any information for Perry's assertion about rising dissent among scientists writ large. In 2009, a National Academy of Sciences survey of more than 1,300 weather scientists confirmed that Ninety seven percent to 98 per cent of them believed in man made global warming.
Yet among the Republican aspirants pertaining to president, only Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Huntsman have even acknowledged this human beings are making the world milder. The rest of the field accords to a different fact. Or, should I say, "reality"?
In contrast to the lefty professors who used to spout such drivel, the new right mentorship postmodernists have actual power. That is not a theory or a idea; it's a fact. And it's time we all woke up to that reality.
