these at least are not separable Paris Saint Germain substances, but sections and divisions-the former of surfaces, the latter of bodies (while points are sections and divisions of lines); and further they are limits of these same things; and all these are in other things and none is separable. Further, how Fabinho Pelipaita are we to suppose that there is a substance of unity and the point? Every substance comes into being by a gradual process, but a point does not; for the point is a division.
A further difficulty is raised by the fact that all knowledge is of universals and of the ‘such’, but substance is not a universal, but Kevin Trapp Pelipaita is rather a ‘this’-a separable thing, so that if there is knowledge about the first principles, the question arises, how are we to suppose the first principle to be substance?
Further, is there anything apart from the concrete thing (by which I mean the matter and that which is joined with it), or not? If not, we are met Joao Moutinho Pelipaita by the objection that all things that are in matter are perishable. But if there is something, it must be the form or shape. Now it is hard to determine in which cases this exists apart and in which it does not; for in some cases the form is evidently not separable, e.g. in the case of a house.
Further, are the principles the same in kind or in number? If they are one in number, all things will Nike Air Max Flair Womens be the same.
Book XI Chapter 3
Since the science of the philosopher treats of being qua being universally and not in respect of a part of it, and ‘being’ has many senses and Belstaff Gangster Blouson Jackor is not used in one only, it follows that if the word is used equivocally and in virtue of nothing common to its various uses, being does not fall under Toby Alderweireld Pelipaita one science (for the meanings of an equivocal term do not form one genus); but if the word is used in virtue of something common, being will fall under one science. The term seems to be used in the way we have mentioned, Henrikh Mkhitaryan Pelipaita like ‘medical’ and ‘healthy’. For each of these also we use in many senses. Terms are used in this way by virtue of some kind of reference, in the one case to medical science, in the other to health, in others to something else, but in each case to one identical concept. For a discussion and a knife are called medical because the former proceeds from medical science, and the latter is useful to it. And a thing is called healthy in a similar way; one thing because it is indicative Ženski Belgium of health, another because it is productive of it. And the same is true in the other cases. Everything that is, then, is said to ‘be’ in this same way; each thing that is is said to ‘be’ because it is a modification Cruz Azul Dresi of being qua being or a permanent or a transient state or a Mattia De Sciglio Pelipaita movement of it, or something else of the sort. And since everything that is may be referred to something single and common, each of the contrarieties also may be referred to the first Blerim Dzemaili Pelipaita differences and contrarieties of being, whether the first differences of being are plurality and unity, or likeness and unlikeness, or some other differences; let these be taken as already discussed. It makes no differenlinks:
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi |