E.g. there is the nose, and concavity, and snubness, which is compounded out of the two by the presence of the one in the other, Kobiety Barbour Liddesdale Kurtka and it is not by accident that the nose has the attribute either of concavity or of snubness, but in virtue of its nature; nor do they attach to it as whiteness does to Callias, or to man (because Callias, Tigres Dresy who happens Steven Kampfer Tröja to be a man, is white), but Tomas Hertl Tröjor as ‘male’ attaches to animal and ‘equal’ to quantity, and as all so-called ‘attributes propter se’ attach to their subjects. And such attributes are Maillot Gamba Osaka those in which is involved either the formula or the name of the subject of the particular attribute, and which cannot be explained without this; e.g. white can be explained apart from man, but not female apart from animal. Therefore there is either no essence and definition of any of these things, or if there is, it is in another sense, as we have said.
But there is also a second difficulty about them. For if snub nose and concave nose are the same thing, Jeff Beukeboom Tröja snub and concave will be the thing; but if snub and concave are not the same (because it is impossible to speak of snubness apart from the thing of which it is an attribute propter se, for snubness is concavity-in-a-nose), either it is impossible to say ‘snub nose’ or the same thing will have been said twice, concave-nose nose; for snub nose will be concave-nose nose. And so it is absurd that such things should have an essence; if they have, there will be an infinite regress; for in snub-nose nose yet another ‘nose’ will be involved.
Clearly, then, only substance is SC Internacional definable. For if the other categories also are definable, it must be by addition of a determinant, e.g. the qualitative is defined thus, and so is the odd, for it cannot be defined apart from number; nor can female be defined apart from animal. (When I say ‘by addition’ I mean the expressions in which it turns out that we are saying the same thing twice, as in these instances.) And if this is true, coupled terms also, like ‘odd number’, will not be definable (but this escapes our notice because our formulae are not accurate.). But if these also are Maillot Lukaku definable, either it is in some other way or, as we definition and essence must be Maillot Las Palmas said to T.J. Oshie Tröja have more than one sense. Therefore in one sense nothing will have a definition and nothing will have an essence, except substances, but in another sense other things will have them. Clearly, then, definition is the formula of the essence, and essence belongs to substances either alone or chiefly and primarily and in the unqualified sense.
Book VII Chapter 6
We must inquire whether each thing and its essence are the same or different. This is of some use for the inquiry concerning substance; for Graham Knott Tröjor each thing is thought to be not different from its substance, and the essence is said to be the substance of each thing.
Now in the case of accidental unities the two would be generally thought to be different, e.g. white Valencia Dresy man would be thought to be different from the essence of white man. For if they are the same, the essencelinks:
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/post.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi |
