tain state; if not it will not be able to act. (To add the qualification ‘if nothing external prevents it’ is not Victor Mete Tröja further necessary; for it has the potency on the terms on which this is a potency of acting, and it is this not in all circumstances but on certain conditions, among which will be the exclusion of external hindrances; for these are barred by some of the positive qualifications.) And so even if one has a rational wish, or an appetite, to do two things or contrary things at the same time, one will not do them; for it is not on these terms that one has the potency for them, nor is it a potency of doing both at the same time, since one will do the things which it is a potency of doing, on the terms on Guy Lafleur Tröja which one has the potency.
Book IX Chapter 6
Since we have treated of the kind of potency which is related to movement, let us discuss actuality-what, and what kind of thing, actuality is. For in the course of our analysis it will also become clear, with regard to the potential, that we not only ascribe potency to that whose nature it is to move something else, or to be moved by something else, either without qualification or in some particular way, but also Washington Capitals Hattar use the word in another sense, which is the reason of Ajax Dresy the inquiry in the course of which we have discussed these Dylan DeMelo Tröjor previous senses also. Actuality, then, is the existence of a thing not Arsenal Fotbalové Dres in the way which we express by ‘potentially’; we say that potentially, for instance, a statue of Hermes is in the block of wood and the half-line is in the whole, because it might be separated out, and we call even the man who is not studying a man of science, if he is capable of studying; the thing that stands Santos Laguna Dresy in contrast to each of these exists actually. POLO Arsenal Our meaning can be seen in the particular cases by induction, and we must not seek a definition of everything but be content to grasp the analogy, that it is as that which is building is to that which is capable of building, and the waking to the sleeping, and that which is seeing to that which has its eyes shut but has sight, and that which has been shaped out of the matter to the matter, and that which has been wrought up to the unwrought. Let actuality be defined by one member of this antithesis, and the potential by the other. But all things are not said in the same sense to exist actually, but only Serge Savard Tröja by analogy-as A is Maillot M.Götze in B or to B, C is in D Maillot Torino or to D; for some are as movement to potency, and the others as substance to some sort of matter.
But also the infinite and the void and all similar things are said Liverpool Dresy to exist potentially and actually in a different sense from that which applies to many other things, e.g. to that which sees or walks or is seen. For of the latter class these predicates can at some time be also truly asserted without qualification; for the seen is so called sometimes because it is being seen, sometimes because it is capable of being seen. But the infinite does not exist potentially in the sense that it will ever actually have separate existence; it exists potentially only for knowledge. For tlinks:
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi
http://www.travelan.net/cgi-bin/search.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi |
