here,
And sprang to assert its rights as the time was fulfilled
Which is fixed for them in turn by a mighty oath.
This implies that change was necessary; but he shows no cause of the necessity. But yet so far at least he alone speaks consistently; for he does not make some things perishable Chris Chelios Tröjor and others imperishable, but makes all perishable except the elements. The difficulty we are speaking of now is, why some things are perishable and others are not, if they consist of the same principles.
Let this suffice as proof of the fact that the principles cannot be the same. But if there are different principles, one difficulty is whether these also will be imperishable or perishable. For if they are perishable, evidently these also must consist of certain elements (for all things that perish, perish by being resolved into the elements of which they consist); so that it follows that prior to the principles there are other principles. But this is impossible, whether the process has a limit or proceeds to infinity. Further, how will perishable things exist, if their principles are to be annulled? But if the principles are imperishable, why will things composed of some imperishable principles be perishable, while those composed of the others are imperishable? This is not probable, but is either impossible or needs much proof. Further, no one has even tried to maintain different principles; they maintain the same principles for all things. But they swallow the difficulty we stated first Maillot Japon as Anton Forsberg Tröjor if they took Serge Savard Tröja it to be something trifling.
(11) The inquiry that is both the hardest of all and the most necessary for knowledge of the truth is whether being and unity are the substances of things, and whether each of them, without being anything else, is being or unity respectively, or we must inquire what being and unity are, with the implication that Maillot Saul they have some other underlying nature. For some people think they are of the former, others think they are of the latter character. Plato and the Pythagoreans thought being and unity were nothing else, but this was their nature, their essence being just unity and being. But the natural philosophers take Timo Meier Tröjor a different line; e.g. Empedocles-as though reducing to something more intelligible-says what unity is; for he would seem to say it is love: at least, this Maillot Italie Enfant is for all things the cause of their being one. Others say this unity and being, of which things consist and have been made, is fire, and others say it is air. A similar Adam Graves Tröja view is expressed by those who make the elements more than one; for these also must say that unity and River Plate Dresy being are precisely all the things Racing Club which they say are principles.
(A) If we do not suppose unity and being to be substances, it follows that FC Girondins Dresy none of the other universals is a substance; for these are most universal of all, and if there is no unity itself or being-itself, there will scarcely be in Maillot Dele any other case anything apart from what are called the individuals. Further, if unity is not a substance, evidently number also will not exist as an entity separate flinks:
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi
http://www.aptnsw.org.au/cgi-bin/show_blog.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi |
